Archive for 2013-06-02

ADD - "Tom Chatfield – Language and digital identity" and more

ADD - "Tom Chatfield – Language and digital identity" and more


Tom Chatfield – Language and digital identity

Posted: 07 Jun 2013 02:00 PM PDT

"Onscreen, today's torrents of pixels exceed anything Auden could have imagined. Yet the hyper-verbal loneliness he evoked feels peculiarly contemporary. Increasingly, we interweave our actions and our rolling digital accounts of ourselves: curators and narrators of our life stories, with a matching move from internal to external monologue. It's a realm of elaborate shows in which status is hugely significant — and one in which articulacy itself risks turning into a game, with attention and impact (retweets, likes) held up as the supreme virtues of self-expression."

Where Looks Don’t Matter and Only the Best Writers Get Laid | The Cluster Mag

Posted: 07 Jun 2013 07:50 AM PDT

Forgetting the device makes it possible to forget that your online identity does not directly correlate with your physical one. Sure, you still "create" or curate yourself online, but now that the Internet is a visual arena with real-time access, your identity is no longer as amorphous or abstracted from reality as it once was. You represent yourself online using a variety of multimedia material, a complete, sensory, dynamic simulacrum of yourself who cannot instantly change or disappear according to a line of text on the screen. Contemporary mass culture equates anonymity with secrecy or downright negative intent, not harmless experimentation. Who lies about who they are online? Pedophiles, scammers, hackers, bullies, Wikileaks. Anonymity has turned from thrilling to terrifying. 1:1 self-to-body ratio is a moral mandate. It's no wonder that nailing down objective reality seems so attractive.

Leave a comment

ADD - "A Religion of Colorblind Policy - Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic" and more

ADD - "A Religion of Colorblind Policy - Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic" and more


A Religion of Colorblind Policy - Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic

Posted: 06 Jun 2013 07:59 AM PDT

This is how segregation compromises the power of black community. It takes a societal ill -- say a lack of insurance -- and then concentrates it one community. Members of the whole community, uninsured and not, feel the effects of this to varying degrees, and a problem that is truly American somehow becomes "black." The black uninsured of Mississippi -- a majority of the uninsured of the state -- are not going to be evenly distributed among the various networks of the state. They are going to be concentrated in one particular network. What the state won't cover, private citizens must. Those citizen will tend to be black. The people who will have to drain their savings will be black. The people who will take out second mortgages will be black. The people who will pick up second jobs (if they can even get them) and miss parenting time will be black. You can multiply this out across social policy, and see how a wealth gap might be perpetuated.

Leave a comment
Powered by Blogger.

Search

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark. Converted by LiteThemes.com.